German companies unconvinced by Brexit tax reduction promises: study

    Source: Xinhua| 2018-09-27 23:09:43|Editor: yan
    Video PlayerClose

    BERLIN, Sept. 27 (Xinhua) -- German companies are highly sceptical that the British government can deliver on a promise to attract more business to Britain by lowering taxes after Brexit, a study published on Thursday by the Foundation for Family Business in Germany and Europe found.

    According to the study, only 11 percent of German companies with commercial links to Britain believe that benefits from a lower corporation tax would outweigh the disadvantages of leaving the European Union (EU). The findings were based on a representative survey of 1,250 businesses conducted by the Ifo institute for economic research on behalf of the Munich-based lobby group for family-owned enterprises.

    Policymakers in Britain have pledged to intensify tax competition with other countries as a means to offset the adverse economic effects of giving up its membership of the EU single market. "My message today is that a post-Brexit Britain will be unequivocally pro-businesses", British Prime Minister Theresa May recently said at a business forum on the sideline of the United Nations (UN) general assembly.

    "So let me say this bit very clearly. Whatever your business, investing in a post-Brexit Britain will give you the lowest rate of corporation tax in the G20", she added.

    In the meanwhile, German Finance Minister Olaf Scholz (SPD) has urged companies in his own country to intensify their preparations for a "no-deal scenario" in which Britain crashes out of the EU without an agreement on its future relationship with the bloc.

    A recent summit of European leaders once again failed to produce a much-needed breakthrough on the key question of how to prevent the erection of a hard border in Northern Ireland, prompting an emergency meeting between EU officials in Brussels on Wednesday to determine which concrete steps to take in response to a disorderly Brexit.

    Even if Britain somehow still succeeds in persuading Germany and other EU nations of the benefits of the Chequers deal preferred by May in time for it to be ratified by March 29, the model would not address concerns voiced by many British-based banks whose service-sector activities are not covered by the agreement.

    As a consequence, these firms are now highly likely to lose their current "passporting" rights to conduct financial business in across the members of the EU as of next year.

    Speaking to Xinhua on Thursday, Thiess Petersen, senior economics expert at the Bertelsmann Foundation, predicted that such economic disruption following Brexit would lead to a rise in the cost of bilateral trade between Germany and Britain.

    "German exports (to Britain) will fall as a consequence, and intermediate goods imported from Britain by German companies will simultaneously become more expensive", Petersen said. He noted that the development would lead to a loss of competitiveness among affected firms, especially in the automotive industry which was characterized by close German-British links in its global value chain.

    Additionally, Petersen pointed to a likely further decline in the value of the pound in the event of a no-deal scenario as an important reason why German companies did not feel re-assured to expand their British activities by promises of lower corporation taxes there. Sterling's anticipated fall would hereby be mirrored in a corresponding re-valuation of the euro, leading to a "further deterioration of export opportunities" to Britain.

    As a consequence, Petersen argued that May's self-declared Brexit pro-business offensive would only appeal to types of enterprises which were primarily targeting British sales with a more localized commercial model. However, firms to whom this circumstance did not apply, would probably still shun Britain in the future in spite of a potential reduction in their fiscal burden.

    "If the United Kingdom is seen primarily as a location for production, from which goods and/or services should be sold across Europe, it makes no sense (to move to Britain after Brexit). To the contrary: In this case a relocation from the United Kingdom to Germany or another EU country would be sensible", Petersen said.

    TOP STORIES
    EDITOR’S CHOICE
    MOST VIEWED
    EXPLORE XINHUANET
    010020070750000000000000011105521374973461
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 992tv国产人成在线观看| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区四川人 | 男女一进一出抽搐免费视频| 国产日韩欧美亚欧在线| aaaa级毛片| 成年人性生活免费视频| 亚洲人成网亚洲欧洲无码| 秋葵视频在线观看在线下载| 天堂√在线中文最新版8| 久久婷婷激情综合色综合俺也去| 美国式禁忌矿桥矿网第11集| 国产精品久久久久影视不卡| h无遮挡男女激烈动态图| 日本人的色道免费网站| 亚洲人成网男女大片在线播放| 男人的j插入女人的p| 国产三级电影在线观看| bbbbwwbbbb搡bbbb| 李丽珍蜜桃成熟时电影3在线观看| 免费又黄又硬又爽大片| 色费女人18毛片a级毛片视频| 国产精品亚洲专区无码不卡| a毛看片免费观看视频| 成年男女免费视频网站| 久久精品成人一区二区三区| 穿长筒袜的有夫之妇hd中文| 国产午夜一级鲁丝片| 18av黄动漫网站在线观看| 天天干天天干天天干| 中文字幕在线观看| 正在播放julia女教师| 又色又爽又黄的视频网站| 97人人模人人爽人人少妇| 日韩中文在线视频| 亚洲国产精品综合久久网各 | 在线a亚洲视频播放在线观看| 久草视频在线资源| 波多野42部无码喷潮在线| 再深点灬舒服了灬太大了乡村| 色欲综合久久中文字幕网| 国内精品视频在线观看|